Environmental campaigners have criticised Donald Trump’s upcoming Aberdeen golf course, branding its environmental claims as “laughable.” Scheduled to open in Aberdeenshire in 2025, Trump International describes the new course as one of the most eco-friendly and sustainable developments. Named MacLeod after Trump’s mother, the 18-hole championship links at Balmedie reportedly uses locally sourced materials and boasts a sustainable irrigation system. The course includes native marram grass plantings and seeds scattered across sand dunes, heathland, and wetland areas.
However, environmentalists have raised concerns, referencing the previous links course at Menie, which led to damage to sand dunes and the loss of its special scientific interest status. Critics argue that claims of environmental friendliness for the new course are unfounded. Bob Ward from the Grantham Research Institute labelled the project as “laughable” and “complete nonsense,” citing irreversible damage already caused to the land. Geomorphologist Jim Hansom highlighted extensive sand displacement during the first course’s construction, impacting soil structure.
Campaigners have also expressed worries about the potential impact on wildlife such as otters, deer, badgers, and geese, as well as various insects and invertebrates in the area. Responding to the criticism, Trump International Golf Links, Scotland defended its practices, emphasising compliance with regulatory standards and the engagement of environmental experts. The company asserted a commitment to integrating the courses with the landscape, prioritising natural features and long-term sustainability. However, sceptics remain unconvinced by the project’s purported environmental benefits.
The controversy surrounding Trump’s Aberdeen golf course illustrates the ongoing debate between development and environmental conservation, with stakeholders scrutinising the balance between economic interests and ecological preservation. As the course’s opening approaches, the clash between business ambitions and environmental concerns continues to spark discussions and calls for greater transparency and accountability in sustainable development practices.