Woman barricaded door to keep cops out after partner used home to supply drugs

A woman tried to keep the police out by barricading the door of her home after her partner used it to supply Class A drugs. The woman’s partner, Martin Ridehalgh, 43, admitted to dealing crack cocaine and heroin during a court hearing. His then-partner, Rachel Ridehalgh, 43, confessed to allowing her premises to be used for drug supply between May 9 and September 26 last year, as reported by Hull Live.

When the police arrived at Rachel Ridehalgh’s home, she attempted to barricade the door to prevent them from entering. Despite her efforts, the police managed to force their way in and discovered stashes of heroin and crack cocaine being sold on the streets, generating substantial profits for Martin Ridehalgh. The search uncovered 293mg of heroin, 3.23g of crack cocaine, digital scales, £549 in cash, a plastic replica pistol, and dealer lists and messages advertising drug sales on a mobile phone.

Prosecutor Jeremy Hill-Baker stated that the drugs found were intended for street dealing directly to users. Rachel Ridehalgh was handling phone calls from potential buyers and explaining the available products but was not directly involved in the dealing itself. The court heard that both individuals had prior convictions, mainly for theft-related offenses, with Martin Ridehalgh having convictions for possessing Class A drugs.

Martin Ridehalgh’s defense lawyer, Oliver Shipley, highlighted his client’s struggles with drug addiction from a young age but noted that he had been drug-free during his time in custody. Rachel Ridehalgh’s representative, Cathy Kioko-Gilligan, acknowledged her awareness of the drug operation but emphasized her lack of direct involvement in drug supply.

Judge Richard Woolfall emphasized the severe impact of drug-related crime on individuals and society, sentencing Martin Ridehalgh to three years and nine months in prison. In contrast, Rachel Ridehalgh received a nine-month suspended sentence and 15 days of rehabilitation.

The case serves as a stark reminder of the consequences associated with drug supply and the legal repercussions that follow. It highlights the need for individuals to take responsibility for their actions and the importance of deterring drug-related criminal activities to protect communities and vulnerable individuals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *