A pregnant mother faced accusations of disrespect towards the court after her XL dogs attacked three times. Jessica Campbell’s partner was injured on the arm while trying to control her dogs, Reggie and Rui. The incident took place when the dogs broke free, causing chaos as Campbell, in her dressing gown, rushed down the street to handle the situation. Campbell’s father was also bitten by Reggie after the dog was rehomed with him. Additionally, Campbell had previous encounters with the law due to Rui’s aggressive behaviour.
During the trial at Liverpool Crown Court, it was revealed that Campbell’s XL dogs had escaped from her home on Netherfield in Widnes on June 28 the previous year. Campbell and her partner chased after the dogs to restrain them, with Campbell managing to grab hold of Rui while her partner struggled with Reggie. CCTV footage presented in court showed the dogs roaming around a neighbour’s garden before Reggie bit Campbell’s partner on the forearm, causing significant puncture wounds that required hospital treatment.
Despite being uncooperative with the police initially, Campbell eventually admitted to her wrongdoing during a second interview. Reggie was handed over to Campbell’s father but ended up biting him as well, leading to the dog being put down. Campbell had a previous conviction related to Rui’s behaviour in 2021. The judge expressed shock that Campbell still had custody of one of the dogs and questioned her remorse, pointing out text messages that suggested otherwise.
Campbell’s defence highlighted her epilepsy and described her actions to control the dog during the incident. The defence also mentioned Campbell’s love for her dogs and her role as a responsible pet owner. However, the judge criticised Campbell for her lack of remorse and irresponsible behaviour. Campbell pleaded guilty to owning a dog that caused injury while dangerously out of control in a public place. She received a suspended prison sentence and a five-year ban on owning dogs.
The judge emphasised the seriousness of the incident, noting Campbell’s previous conviction and her conduct following the attack. Despite considering mitigating factors such as Campbell’s health and caring for a young child, the judge underscored the recklessness and irresponsibility displayed by the defendant. Campbell’s actions, including delayed euthanasia of the dog, were deemed unacceptable by the court. The judge expressed concern about the safety of the dog in Campbell’s care, given her history and living situation with a baby.
In conclusion, Campbell was sentenced based on the gravity of the incident, her previous conviction, and her conduct afterwards. The judge highlighted the potential harm caused by the out-of-control dogs and the need for accountability in such situations. Campbell’s case serves as a reminder of the importance of responsible pet ownership and the consequences of failing to control dangerous animals in public spaces.