Joanna Cherry has accused the SNP of deeply rooted “misogyny” over allegations that the Government is supporting Westminster leader Stephen Flynn’s bid for Holyrood. The former MP highlighted the disparity in treatment between Flynn and herself, noting that obstacles were deliberately placed in her path when she expressed interest in standing for Holyrood in 2021. Cherry, a vocal critic of Nicola Sturgeon, eventually withdrew her candidacy due to the SNP’s requirement for sitting MPs to resign if they wished to run for Holyrood.
The SNP’s move to introduce an anti-double jobbing rule aimed at keeping Cherry out of Holyrood stands in stark contrast to the alleged support provided to Flynn in maintaining his Westminster seat while pursuing a Holyrood candidacy. Reports suggest that SNP Ministers intervened to assist Flynn despite plans to ban double jobbing being on the table for the next Holyrood election. This timing conveniently aligns with Flynn’s ambitions.
In a scathing statement, Cherry took aim at the SNP’s actions, stating, “Anyone doubting the deep-rooted problem of misogyny in the current SNP should contrast the assistance given to a man seen as having leadership ambitions with the obstacles thrown in the path of a woman suspected of having the same.” The SNP is also facing accusations of double standards regarding the expiration of the anti-Cherry internal rule, which may no longer apply to the upcoming election.
Critics, including Scottish Greens MSP Ross Greer, have demanded answers from the SNP, highlighting concerns about the decision-making process surrounding double jobbing. Flynn’s aspiration to secure a candidacy in Aberdeen South and North Kincardine has raised further tensions within the party, with claims that he is seeking to displace sitting MSP Audrey Nicoll. The controversy surrounding Flynn’s dual ambitions has raised questions about integrity and fairness within the SNP.
As the debate continues within the party, the spotlight remains on the perceived gender biases and inconsistencies in the SNP’s handling of parliamentary candidacies. The accusations of “misogyny” levied by Cherry have reignited discussions about equality and representation in Scottish politics, with calls for transparency and accountability among party officials.
**Insights & Summary:**
Joanna Cherry’s allegations of “misogyny” within the SNP shed light on the complexities and challenges facing women in politics, particularly regarding issues of representation and opportunity. The controversy surrounding Stephen Flynn’s dual candidacy aspirations has sparked a broader conversation about fairness, integrity, and gender equality within political parties. As the SNP grapples with internal tensions and accusations of double standards, the need for clear and equitable processes in candidate selection becomes increasingly apparent. Cherry’s bold stance serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggles for women in leadership roles and the importance of addressing systemic biases within political institutions.